четверг, 4 апреля 2019 г.
Perceptions of ESL Teachers in Taiwan
Perceptions of ESL Teachers in TaiwanSYNOPSISThis study suss outs ESL program teachers experiences, perceptions, attitudes and utilize of schoolroom judgment in Taiwan. It is aimed to explore teachers understanding of schoolroom sound judgment and their appraisal strategies moreover, to examine whether there be any relationships between teachers experiences, perceptions and social occasion of classroom measurement in private ESL schools in Taiwan. xxx teachers across three private ESL schools were surveyed character a questionnaire. Among 30 teachers, 4 teachers volunteered to participate in the semi-structured call into questions. data collected from questionnaire and interview provides the researcher with an cleverness into teachers perceptions, attitudes and use of sagacity methods in their classroom.The results show that ESL program teachers were appointed ab out the effectiveness of classroom assessment and formative assessment strategies and had a tendency to use positively charged feedback to encourage ingesters to improve their linguistic process ability. Most teachers had more than 3 years of teach experience in principle side and placed focus on formative assessment in order to ensure schools policy, learners needfully, and p arnts demands.There is a need to do further research in such unique educational context, questionable ESL schools in Taiwan, to explore teachers difficulties and needs moreover, to provide support, such as teachers in-service train, which may lead to benefiting learners. physical objectThis mixed methods research is designed to investigate ESL private school teachers perceptions, attitude and use of classroom assessment in Taiwan. Two instruments are used in this research, including a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, to explore teachers experiences, attitudes, and perceptions of classroom assessment and their suffer assessment strategies.Rationale and contextThis study has been motivated by two cistrons first, in 2010, Dr. Rea-Dickins introduced the central characteristics of classroom assessment in Language Testing and Assessment (LTA) course, such as providing larn opportunities for eruditeness or language awareness and nurturing language, which helped me to gain new knowledge about the concept of assessment for learning, in cost of formative assessment. After reading several research studies in relation to classroom-based assessment, I recognize the benefits of assessment, peculiar(prenominal) with formative assessment, and how teachers can monitor learner progress, inform teaching and support learning by dint of using multiple assessment methods in the classroom. I have the desire to understand whether side of meat teachers use motley formative assessment methods, such as teacher and peer feedback, scaffolding and assessment to help learners prove learning or they mainly focus on grading and recording learning progress.The second factor is related to the fact that we have relatively little knowledge at ESL private school teachers classroom assessment hold and their understanding and attitude toward assessment in Taiwan moreover, this is an area in which it appears that may have an impact on young learners in learning English. Assessment plays a central and all important(predicate) role both in teaching and learning. Teachers use their own assessment practices, which may have the effectiveness do work on their learners learning, to assess and improve learners language ability.In addition, assessment is synonymous to exams and tests for most teachers, pupils, and parents In Taiwan where traditional paper-and pencil assessment remained as the main acknowledgment informing learners learning (Yip, 2005). Edelenbos and Kubanek-German (2004) to a fault point out the assumption that formal testing is universally referred to the only assessment methods a teacher uses. McNamara (2000) noted that traditional paper-and pencil language assessment and performance assessment are two major forms of assessment. In other words, English teachers tend to use the latter to know how their learners use their existing language knowledge related in a given context and to measure learners language ability at the end of a certain period of teaching and learning through the former. As can be seen, the notion of assessment is generally associated with testing and it seems to be under-developed in fields of applied linguistics and general education. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate how English teachers perceive the concept of classroom assessment and what assessment methods they use in their classroom in Taiwan.1.2.1 English learning environment in TaiwanIn 1997, the Ministry of direction (MOE) implemented educational reform and introduced the Nine-Year Integrated political program (NYIC) which has greatly influenced the syllabus and materials design of elementary and last schools in Taiwan. One of the majo r changes is that pupils, who used to begin learning English in junior spirited schools (age 11), scratch line to learn English as a Foreign Language in grade 3 (age 9) in elementary schools. English instructions were officially incorporated into elementary school education which brought more business opportunities on English learning and teaching due to the change magnitude demand for English learning. much(prenominal) changing situation has also impact the age of learning English in Taiwan, where children now start to learn English at an early age.In addition, according to The Guidelines of English Learning Area in Grade 1-9 Curriculum, the new English syllabus beams a more communicative orientation and places focus on teacher-learners interactions. It also aims to create an enjoyable learning environment to motivate learners to speak English in English classroom. This appears to suggest that teachers should use more formative assessment methods, in terms of encouraging learn ers to improve learning and providing more language learning opportunities to them.Furthermore, learners are expected to achieve three goals in Grade 1-9 CurriculumTo equip with basic communicative competence and apply it into real-life situations.To develop learning strategies and be able to learn language effectively and autonomously.To gain knowledge about foreign cultures and be able to respect several(predicate) cultures.The adjustment in English curriculum is consistent with the current trend in research studies of English as an Additional Language (EAL). Teachers are acting as supporters to scaffold and motivate learners to enhance learning during the whole learning process. In addition, Taiwanese government empowers local schools and teachers to choose teaching materials, such as textbooks, to meet learners needs moreover, it begins to value pupils individual differences. By doing so, teachers may be able to choose impound tasks and activities for their learners and focus on individual learning. As can be seen, teachers are now generally increasing the use of formative assessment strategies to assist learners learning in the classroom in Taiwan1.2.2 shaping Assessment in language classrooms in TaiwanGenerally, English teachers in Taiwan are necessitate to correct all the errors in all students work, including worksheets, textbooks and practice books, due to the pressure from the schools and parents. Such demand from schools and parents is unitary of major sources of pressure for teachers in Taiwan. As can be seen, teacher feedback, particularly with written feedback, appears to be seen as one major part of teachers routine work. Huang (2006) reports that in Taiwan most English teachers use teacher feedback, as a formative assessment method, on learners grammatical errors in writing.In addition, portfolio assessment is a common assessment tool used by English teachers in Taiwan. Tsai (2004) and Wang (2002) both refer that teachers use portfolio ass essment as an instrument to assess learners achievement rather than improving learning moreover, Wu (2007) points out that instead of using portfolios assessment in a formative way most teachers use it for summational purposes, in terms of recording each learners achievement. Furthermore, Yip (2005) reports that traditional standardized tests remain the main source of informing and measuring learners learning for most English teachers in Taiwan. As can be seen, the dominance of classroom assessment may not have been identified in the language assessment belles-lettres and assessment has not reached its full potential in English classrooms in Taiwan.Organization of this researchIn the next chapter, literature on relevant issues involves definition and functions of classroom assessment and assessment of young learners are reviewed. Methodology of data collection and analysis and a disputeion of ethical, validity and reliability issues are introduced in Chapter 3, followed by the p resentation of the findings and discussion derived from the results of both questionnaire and interview data. Chapter 5 summaries the research findings and provides demarcation lines and future research.CHAPTER 5 determination5.1 IntroductionThis research has explored teachers attitudes, perceptions, and use of assessment in classrooms. In this chapter, limitations of the study will first be discussed, followed by Implications for pedagogy and this study.5.2 Limitations of the studyThere are several limitations and problematic aspects in the methodology. First, one limitation in this research is the small size sample (N=30) which may influence the reliability of the result in relation to the correlationship between teachers years of teaching experience and their assessment methods. Size of the sample is vitalfor an right estimate of the relationship between variables. In addition, without classroom observation, it is difficult to examine teachers day-to-day assessment practice an d the whole process of assessment. Observation plays a significant role in confirming teachers interview responses with their genuine assessment practice in the classroom. Follow-up interviews are also important in gaining some insight into the behavioural patterns and assessment practice of teachers during the assessment process by providing explanations of their instructional and diagnostic behavior and assessment strategies. The involvement of a larger questionnaire sample size, classroom observation and follow-up interviews may lead to growing reliability of the data and a better and completed understanding of teachers assessment practice in classrooms.5.3 Implications for pedagogy and teacher trainingAll 5 interviewed teachers indicate that they gain new information about assessment through meeting with teachers from the same grade, for instance, all grade 1 teachers have a meeting to discuss teaching ideas and lesson plans once a week. However, there seems to be an insuffici ency level of in-service training activities for meeting the needs of ESL program teachers. Teachers recognize the importance of developing knowledge, competence, capacities and classroom assessment strategies in order to improve teaching and learners learning. This may suggest that there is a need to provide continuing professional development (CPD) and training courses to update new knowledge and information, in relation to planning for teaching, practical approaches and assessment, and more importantly to reflect on their own teaching.5.3 Implications for further researchThere is a critical need for more studies to investigate ESL program teachers difficulty in implementing classroom assessment strategies in schools and their diagnostic competence, in terms of their observational and interpretative ability, during classroom teaching. Due to teachers decision-making, assessment cognition network (Yin 2005) and teacher diagnostic competence (Edelenbos and Kubanek-German 2004) are key elements in supporting and assessing learners in classrooms. Moreover, their capacities, knowledge and beliefs may have an impact on how they assess learner performance during the teaching and their diagnostic competence, including the skills they use to guess what learners want to say and the abilities to provide language samples of learners language growth, may influence the amount of language learning opportunities they provide for individual learner during the teaching and learning.Furthermore, further research is needed in exploring teachers representation and implementation of classroom assessment to reveal factors which influence teachers perceptions and interpretation of assessment. In addition, ESL program teachers use of the materials, which involve standardized and teacher made tests and a rotary of assessment instruments, should also be examined, in terms of the reliability and validity of teacher assessment. Finally, the scope of so-called ESL school teachers class room assessment perceptions and strategies research should be expanded to include other Asia countries, such as Korea and China.5.4 ConclusionThe focus of this research is to investigate so-called ESL school teachers perceptions, attitudes and use of classroom assessment in Taiwan, an EFL context. A mixed methods approach is used to collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data, including questionnaire and interview data. This study provides a window to reveal how teachers , who aim to enhance Taiwanese learners English ability through adopting ESL curriculum and teaching materials to teach learners in an EFL context, perceive the construct of classroom assessment, their attitudes toward assessment and use of assessment methods. The results show a strong emphasis on formative, as opposed to summative, assessment practice among 30 teachers across 3 private ESL schools moreover, the data suggests a need for CPD courses to improve teaching and learning and to preserve tea chers from suffering burnout and emotional exhaustion.
Подписаться на:
Комментарии к сообщению (Atom)
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий
Примечание. Отправлять комментарии могут только участники этого блога.